IRVING, Texas -- The last week in the Big 12 was, well, so very Big 12.Going into the week, few, even insiders within the conference, wouldve predicted that the league would stunningly vote to pursue expansion.Even fewer couldve guessed that two days later the University of Texas would throw its weight behind the one expansion candidate prevailing wisdom suggested the Longhorns wouldve been dead-set on blocking.Even by Big 12 standards, it was a wild week for the conference, setting the tone for what should be a dramatic couple of months that figures to shape the immediate future of the Big 12, while also determining its long-term viability.The Big 12 marches to the beat of its own drum, one industry insider said.Its incredibly fascinating.What happened?When the presidents and chancellors entered the conference room at the Four Seasons hotel in Irving last Tuesday, the expectation around the league and among the leadership of expansion hopefuls was that the Big 12 would finally quash the expansion debate, at the very least in the interim.Oklahoma president David Boren had been pushing for expansion, but in conjunction with the implementation of a conference network. He rightly believed more eyeballs and content would be critical to getting a network off the ground. When the TV partners balked during the three-day Big 12 meetings in June, Boren backed off expansion, too.Monday of last week, however, the expansion flame that had seemingly been doused was reignited. That evening, multiple reports surfaced that the ACC and ESPN had agreed to a deal on a conference network beginning in 2019, leaving the Big 12 as the only major conference without a network.Its unclear as to whether the ACC network revelation was the impetus to the Big 12 taking expansion action. To whatever level, it was a factor, according to multiple sources. So too were the -- as commissioner Bob Bowlsby put it -- conclusionary presentations of the Big 12s hired consultants BHV and Navigate Research, which have been pushing for the conference to be more aggressive to enhance its long-term stability. The combination of the two resulted in a unanimous vote authorizing Bowlsby to begin negotiating with expansion candidates.While we had a setback in terms of interest from media partners on a conference network. ... there seems to be some competitive advantage (for expansion) to get into a playoff, and obviously financial advantages, Boren told ESPN.com last week. Were going to continue to look at those questions, separate and apart from the potential of any kind of a network.That, however, wouldnt be the only Big 12 bombshell.What is Texas up to?As surprising as the expansion announcement was, Texas president Greg Fenves sudden endorsement of the University of Houstons candidacy over Twitter was just as shocking. The common-held thought around the league was that Texas would be Houstons biggest roadblock to Big 12 entry; instead, the Longhorns have emerged, at least on the surface, as Houstons champion.Are Texas motives pure?The Austin American-Statesman was the first to report late last week that Texas might be more interested in building a $450 million research center on 300 acres of land in Houston than simply helping the Cougars get into the Big 12.Since the inception of the conference, when Texas Gov. Ann Richards helped Baylor get into the league, Texas state politics have played a heavy part in every realignment turn in the Big 12.This time could be no different.According to those reports, Houston boosters indicated they would consider dropping their opposition to Texas expansion into Houston in exchange for the Longhorns helping the Cougars get into the Big 12.Two sources at Houston denied to ESPN.com that any quid pro quo had been agreed to. Furthermore, longtime State Sen. John Whitmire (D-Houston) emphatically denied to the Statesman that any exchange behind closed doors was taking place.For anyone to think theres a swap there, I say not only no, but hell no, he told the newspaper.Either way, whatever the motive, with Texas playing its hand on Houston so early, it has placed the Big 12s other flagship school in an interesting spot.Oklahoma and Boren could agree to support Houstons candidacy, effectively sealing the Cougars Big 12 entry, provided that Texas would agree to what the Sooners want.What does Oklahoma want?Boren, the Big 12 board chair, has been mum on which schools he prefers for expansion, though the Cincinnati Enquirer reported in May that he had been in communication with then-University of Cincinnati president Santa Ono.You are truly an outstanding leader and knowing that you are at the helm in Cincinnati makes me even more inclined to support your cause, Boren wrote to Ono in an email last year. Ono, however, is set to become the president of the University of British Columbia in August.Boren could also try to put the network back on the table, but at this juncture, that could be a long shot if not an impossibility. Through pro-rata agreements, Big 12 TV partners ESPN and Fox are already contractually obligated to pony up roughly $25 million per year to the league for each expansion candidate the conference adds. In other words, if the Big 12 adds four schools, ESPN and Fox would be on the hook for an estimated $700 million through the end of the current TV deal that runs through 2024-25.More feasibly, Boren will be able to demand Texas support Oklahomas school of choice in exchange for his vote for Houston.Who might that school be? And who else will emerge as expansion favorites?Are legit candidates emerging?Will the Big 12s TV partners push for an extension to the grant of rights, similar to 10-year extension the ACC signed?Will the additional $50 million a year tempt the league to expand to 14?With Texas apparently behind it, Houston appears to be the early favorite. The Cougars will be pitching to the Big 12 that the SEC has gained a stranglehold on the Houston TV market, which is the 10th-largest in the country -- and that only the University of Houston can help bring it back. Last year, only two Big 12 games -- Oklahoma-Texas and Baylor-TCU -- ranked in the top 10 of TV games in the market. The SEC, meanwhile, produced six of the 10 games in Houston, including the top 3. Houstons games against Temple and Navy, however, placed fifth and ninth for the year in the market.The SEC right now owns the city of Houston from a TV ratings standpoint, said billionaire businessman and Houston board chair Tilman Fertitta, who pointed out that adding Houston would help boost the ratings for ancillary Big 12 games in the Houston market, as well. Those eyeballs in Houston are extremely important to the Big 12.The Big 12 needs to own Houston, not the SEC.At least one Big 12 president has concerns about adding another Texas school.I feel a lot of the [Big 12] presidents feel the league is Texas-heavy already, which helps with the Texas school, Iowa State president Steven Leath told the Ames Register.Like Houston, BYU will also be heavily involved in expansion discussions. Unlike other candidates, these Cougars avoided getting caught politicking Big 12 leaders in emails and refrained from talking publicly about the Big 12, until late last week.As of [Tuesday], it became real, BYU athletic director Tom Holmoe told ESPN.com Friday. Theyve said, were now looking at [expanding].By any measure, BYU has the best football tradition of any non-Power 5 program out there, with the seventh-most wins in the FBS dating back to 1980.BYUs candidacy, however, is complicated. The school does not play games on Sundays, due to its affiliation with the Mormon Church. That wouldnt affect football, but it would affect scheduling in several non-football sports, notably soccer and baseball. Despite this, Holmoe told ESPN.com that BYU will be pushing for full membership. He also acknowledged that the Cougars would be open to a football-only agreement.Football prowess wont be the only point of contention as the Big 12 mines candidates. Academics could be an underrated factor, especially if the league opts to expand by four.Boren mentioned academic standards as one of the five core criteria the league will consider, along with competitiveness of athletic programs, fan base, access to media markets and overall reputation. That could bolster Tulanes dark-horse candidacy, while damaging South Floridas. Last week, ESPN reported the NCAA is investigating South Floridas mens basketball program on allegations of academic fraud.As one industry insider and a Big 12 AD reiterated, the presidents will be making the call on which schools will be invited, and academics could play a bigger role than you might think.According to sources, Central Florida, Connecticut and Colorado State have also garnered support from different corners of the Big 12.Central Florida operates in a top-20 TV market and sits in the middle of one of the top recruiting hotbeds in the country.Some view Connecticut as the Big 12s gateway into the populous Northeast, including the coveted New York City market. The Huskies also have already touted their $71 million athletic budget, which dwarfs that of several expansion candidates. UConn boasts a solid academic profile as a state school, too.Colorado State will have a new on-campus stadium completed by 2017, and claims it can bring the Denver market, which ranks 17th nationally. According to the Coloradoan newspaper, Denver also features more than 35,000 Big 12 alums.We are looking for members that will grow over time as we grow, that will bring stability to the conference and that have a high top end, and will benefit from an affiliation with the schools that are currently in our conference, Bowlsby said. Its important that they strengthen the family and we strengthen them.The University of Memphis is banking that applies to it.The school continues to have the delivery-services giant FedEx, based in Memphis, backing its candidacy. FedEx has pledged to sponsor a Big 12 championship game if Memphis is invited, though its unclear what advantage that is for the Tigers. One Big 12 insider suggested the league would have no issue landing a sponsorship for its title game, which is returning to the conference next year. Memphis, however, has also promised to make a $500 million investment in academic and athletic infrastructure over the next five years.Were looking at those schools that not only have arrived competitively, Boren said immediately after the Big 12 vote, but have a huge potential to improve their competitive capabilities by becoming members.The race to get into the Big 12 has officially begun. Suggesting one fascinating week in the Big 12 will be the first of many to come. Teoscar Hernandez Jersey . -- Ryan Getzlaf grabbed the three pucks wrapped in tape and held them up to his chest in the Anaheim Ducks dressing room for a celebration nine seasons in the making. Justin Smoak Jersey . After Martin Skrtel put the Reds in front from close range at Stamford Bridge after only four minutes, Hazard hit back in the 17th with a superb strike. Etoo gave Jose Mourinhos team a decisive lead from Oscars back pass in the 34th. http://www.bluejaysonline.com/blue-jays-randal-grichuk-jersey/ . The 27-year-old Scrivens will be joining his third NHL club since signing with the Toronto Maple Leafs as a free agent in 2010. The move also reunites with him with head coach Dallas Eakins from their time together with the American Hockey Leagues Toronto Marlies. Jesse Barfield Jersey . The Cincinnati Reds remain perfect with their speedy rookie outfielder in the starting lineup. Justin Smoak Blue Jays Jersey . Jason Zucker and Matt Cooke also scored for Minnesota, which has won five of six. Kuemper made five saves in the first, nine in the second, and nine in the third. The rookies best save came with 2:17 left in the third period when he denied former Wild forward Matt Cullen from just outside of the crease on the right side. TOKYO -- The price tag of the 2020 Tokyo Olympics could exceed 3 trillion yen ($30 billion) unless drastic cost-cutting measures are taken and several key venues are relocated, an expert panel warned Thursday in the latest blow to Japanese organizers.Naturally, anyone who hears these numbers is alarmed, panel leader Shinichi Ueyama said.The Olympic investigation team was launched by newly elected Tokyo Gov. Yuriko Koike after she raised concerns about growing cost estimates and the potential burden on the city and its taxpayers.The panel said the ballooning costs reflect an absence of leadership, as well as a lack of governance and awareness of cost control.The report, submitted to Koike on Thursday, reviewed three out of seven permanent venues that Tokyo is planning to build, and proposed using existing locations rather than new facilities that could end up being white elephants. It proposed moving rowing and canoeing more than 400 kilometers (250 miles) outside the city, as well as finding new sites for swimming and volleyball.Koike said she plans to discuss possible options with International Olympic Committee officials who are expected to visit Japan in the coming weeks.We cannot impose the negative legacy onto the Tokyo residents, Koike told reporters.Preparations for Japans first Summer Olympics since Tokyo hosted the 1964 Games have been plagued by a series of scandals and problems, including the new national stadiums high cost and design, and allegations of bribery in the bidding process.Concerns over Tokyos budget come amid growing global scrutiny over the costs of hosting the Olympics. Many cities have been scared off by the record $51 billion in overall costs associated with the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi. Romes bid for the 2024 Olympics was rejected last week by the new mayor, citing concerns over high costs.The estimated 3 trillion yen cost of the Tokyo Games is more than a four-fold increase from the initial estimate at the time of the citys s successful bid for the games in 2013.Ueyama, a Keio University public policy professor, criticized Tokyos Olympic organizers as irresponsible, comparing them to a company without a president and a chief financial officer.Tokyo organizing committee president Yoshiro Mori acknowledged in July 2015 that the total cost could exceed 2 trillion yen ($20 billion), doubling his unofficial estimate a year earlier.Mori has said the original figures were the result of sloppy calculations which he blamed on the Tokyo metropolitan government and Japanese Olympic Committeee.ddddddddddddOn Thursday, Mori criticized the panels proposals for venue moves, saying it would be difficult to change the existing plans approved by the IOC.At this point, it would be extremely difficult to turn everything upside down from the Japanese side, he said.Tokyo has already implemented a series of venue changes which the IOC has said will save around $1 billion. Any further changes would require the approval of the IOC and relevant international sports federations.The panels report said venue costs had been driven up by overestimated stadium capacities, use of unnecessarily high-grade equipment and lack of a budget ceiling.Plans for long-term use of big new permanent facilities are overly optimistic considering Japans declining population and aging society, Ueyama said.To cut costs, the report proposed moving the rowing and canoeing venue away from Tokyo and renovating existing facilities for two other sports.The latest cost estimate for the rowing and canoeing venue stands at 49 billion yen ($490 million), seven times higher than the initial forecast. The current plan hopes to turn the venue, a former site of a garbage plant, into a mecca for the sport and attract 40,000 visitors, but the panel said that is overly optimistic in a country with only several hundred athletes in rowing and canoeing.The panel proposed moving rowing and canoeing to Tome City, about 440 kilometers (270 miles) -- or a three-hour train ride -- northeast of Tokyo in the prefecture of Miyagi.The report said a planned swimming venue with a capacity of 20,000 is way above the 12,000-seat requirement, and proposed renovating an existing Olympic-class facility in Tokyos Tatsumi area. It urged seeking an existing venue for volleyball instead of building a new arena in Tokyos Ariake coastal area.Tokyo won the right to host the games in 2013 by promising a compact bid with 28 of the 31 competition venues within an eight-kilometer (5-mile) radius of the Olympic Village. Originally, only shooting, modern pentathlon and one football venue were to be outside the eight-kilometer radius.Already, venues for basketball, taekwondo and cycling have been moved outside of Tokyo to maximize existing facilities. Cycling was moved to Izu, some 145 kilometers (90 miles) southwest of the capital.---Follow Mari Yamaguchi at https://www.twitter.com/mariyamaguchiFind her work at http://bigstory.ap.org/content/mari-yamaguchi ' ' '